<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for New Auburn Personal Computer Services LLC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog</link>
	<description>professional web development and consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On The Desired Complexity of Rails by Joe Fiorini</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2011/08/21/on-the-desired-complexity-of-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-28547</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Fiorini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=294#comment-28547</guid>
		<description>Well said Brian. I too have seen a use for some of these more complex patterns in my projects. Let&#039;s always remember that we&#039;re using Ruby. For example, dependency injection is useful in some cases in Ruby, but any Ruby developer worth his salt should be able to think of a better way to configure an IoC container than a complex XML schema. As a more concrete example, when I&#039;ve written presenters (similar to the decorators you mentioned) I make heavy use of Ruby&#039;s Delegator class so I can completely wrap the model. IMO far more elegant than what I could do in a less dynamic language. Rails was built to make developers more productive. As we apply these patterns we should use that as our constraint to build better solutions than what we&#039;ve had in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Brian. I too have seen a use for some of these more complex patterns in my projects. Let&#8217;s always remember that we&#8217;re using Ruby. For example, dependency injection is useful in some cases in Ruby, but any Ruby developer worth his salt should be able to think of a better way to configure an IoC container than a complex XML schema. As a more concrete example, when I&#8217;ve written presenters (similar to the decorators you mentioned) I make heavy use of Ruby&#8217;s Delegator class so I can completely wrap the model. IMO far more elegant than what I could do in a less dynamic language. Rails was built to make developers more productive. As we apply these patterns we should use that as our constraint to build better solutions than what we&#8217;ve had in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On The Desired Complexity of Rails by bryanl</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2011/08/21/on-the-desired-complexity-of-rails/comment-page-1/#comment-28546</link>
		<dc:creator>bryanl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=294#comment-28546</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve stumbled on the fine line of &quot;should we make this easy to code, or should we be nice to future developers?&quot; I could type paragraphs and paragraphs of reasons to keep things simple, but I&#039;d just be wasting my time. 

Projects grow up. Projects get transferred to other developers. The time tested patterns that may bring with them a bit of complexity always seem to be the better solutions. The trick is to turn the complex pattern into a simple abstraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve stumbled on the fine line of &#8220;should we make this easy to code, or should we be nice to future developers?&#8221; I could type paragraphs and paragraphs of reasons to keep things simple, but I&#8217;d just be wasting my time. </p>
<p>Projects grow up. Projects get transferred to other developers. The time tested patterns that may bring with them a bit of complexity always seem to be the better solutions. The trick is to turn the complex pattern into a simple abstraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sharing Vim configs with Mac and Windows using Dropbox by Tweets that mention New Auburn Personal Computer Services LLC » Blog Archive » Sharing Vim configs with Mac and Windows using Dropbox -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2011/01/27/sharing-vim-configs-with-mac-and-windows-using-dropbox/comment-page-1/#comment-28425</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention New Auburn Personal Computer Services LLC » Blog Archive » Sharing Vim configs with Mac and Windows using Dropbox -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=262#comment-28425</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian P. Hogan, PRO Law. PRO Law said: New Auburn Personal Computer Services LLC » Blog Archive » Sharing ...: I&#039;ve devised a setup that lets me keep a... http://bit.ly/eWv82o [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian P. Hogan, PRO Law. PRO Law said: New Auburn Personal Computer Services LLC » Blog Archive » Sharing &#8230;: I&#039;ve devised a setup that lets me keep a&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/eWv82o" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/eWv82o</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sharing Vim configs with Mac and Windows using Dropbox by Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2011/01/27/sharing-vim-configs-with-mac-and-windows-using-dropbox/comment-page-1/#comment-28423</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=262#comment-28423</guid>
		<description>@Mark:

Because with Mac and Linux, I don&#039;t have to push or pull, I can just symlink. Change something at the office and my home machine has it all there when I get home.  

Many of my dotfiles are done the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark:</p>
<p>Because with Mac and Linux, I don&#8217;t have to push or pull, I can just symlink. Change something at the office and my home machine has it all there when I get home.  </p>
<p>Many of my dotfiles are done the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sharing Vim configs with Mac and Windows using Dropbox by Marc Harter</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2011/01/27/sharing-vim-configs-with-mac-and-windows-using-dropbox/comment-page-1/#comment-28422</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Harter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=262#comment-28422</guid>
		<description>Great to see you back at the Vimmer Mr Hogan.  Good post!  Wonder why you chose Dropbox over sharing with GitHub?  Avoid pulling and pushing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see you back at the Vimmer Mr Hogan.  Good post!  Wonder why you chose Dropbox over sharing with GitHub?  Avoid pulling and pushing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Accessibility &#8211; The Screenreader Experience Part One by Andrea Giammarchi</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/10/15/web-accessibility-the-screenreader-experience-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-28146</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Giammarchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=228#comment-28146</guid>
		<description>solution proposal: http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2010/10/pre-authorization-meta-tag-proposal.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>solution proposal: <a href="http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2010/10/pre-authorization-meta-tag-proposal.html" rel="nofollow">http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2010/10/pre-authorization-meta-tag-proposal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Accessibility &#8211; The Screenreader Experience Part One by MacRae Linton</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/10/15/web-accessibility-the-screenreader-experience-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-28145</link>
		<dc:creator>MacRae Linton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=228#comment-28145</guid>
		<description>Why aren&#039;t you using the Alex voice for screen reading? Are you using stock Voice Over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why aren&#8217;t you using the Alex voice for screen reading? Are you using stock Voice Over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Accessibility &#8211; The Screenreader Experience Part One by The Screenreader Experience Part One: What Twitter.com Sounds Like &#124; Techarama</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/10/15/web-accessibility-the-screenreader-experience-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-28140</link>
		<dc:creator>The Screenreader Experience Part One: What Twitter.com Sounds Like &#124; Techarama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=228#comment-28140</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments&#013;&#013;View full post on Hacker News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments&#013;&#013;View full post on Hacker News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Accessibility &#8211; The Screenreader Experience Part One by Web Axe</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/10/15/web-accessibility-the-screenreader-experience-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-28133</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Axe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=228#comment-28133</guid>
		<description>Great article and demo, thanks. PS: Have you tried the (third-party) Accessible Twitter web app? http://www.AccessibleTwitter.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article and demo, thanks. PS: Have you tried the (third-party) Accessible Twitter web app? <a href="http://www.AccessibleTwitter.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.AccessibleTwitter.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web Accessibility &#8211; The Screenreader Experience Part One by Srdjan Pejic</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/10/15/web-accessibility-the-screenreader-experience-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-28132</link>
		<dc:creator>Srdjan Pejic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=228#comment-28132</guid>
		<description>Wow, it was as painful as I imagined it would be. And by comparison to most sites I worked with, Twitter&#039;s site is pretty clean from the HTML standpoint. I cannot even imagine how a table-based site would sound.

These are all good tips to remember.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it was as painful as I imagined it would be. And by comparison to most sites I worked with, Twitter&#8217;s site is pretty clean from the HTML standpoint. I cannot even imagine how a table-based site would sound.</p>
<p>These are all good tips to remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.255 seconds -->

