<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Rails?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/02/16/why-rail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/02/16/why-rail/</link>
	<description>professional web development and consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:56:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinova: Ruby on Rails, Web Design, Web Development, Web Solutions Company, Singapore &#187; Why Rails?</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/02/16/why-rail/comment-page-1/#comment-27832</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinova: Ruby on Rails, Web Design, Web Development, Web Solutions Company, Singapore &#187; Why Rails?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=132#comment-27832</guid>
		<description>[...] With Rails, we can build and launch a prototype application in an extremely short time. On average, we can have something simple in front of the client in less than a couple of days, which is much faster than our previous projects where we used ASP or PHP. And that project isn&#8217;t usually a throwaway project; we can tweak it and move forward, from prototype to production. via napcsweb.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With Rails, we can build and launch a prototype application in an extremely short time. On average, we can have something simple in front of the client in less than a couple of days, which is much faster than our previous projects where we used ASP or PHP. And that project isn&#8217;t usually a throwaway project; we can tweak it and move forward, from prototype to production. via napcsweb.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Rails? &#8211; Jupiter Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2010/02/16/why-rail/comment-page-1/#comment-27591</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Rails? &#8211; Jupiter Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/?p=132#comment-27591</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Rails?    With Rails, we can build and launch a prototype application in an extremely short time. On average, we can have something simple in front of the client in less than a couple of days, which is much faster than our previous projects where we used ASP or PHP. And that project isn&#8217;t usually a throwaway project; we can tweak it and move forward, from prototype to production. via napcsweb.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Rails?    With Rails, we can build and launch a prototype application in an extremely short time. On average, we can have something simple in front of the client in less than a couple of days, which is much faster than our previous projects where we used ASP or PHP. And that project isn&#8217;t usually a throwaway project; we can tweak it and move forward, from prototype to production. via napcsweb.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.250 seconds -->

