<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accessible Rails Apps &#8211; Images and Alternative Text</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2009/07/03/accessible-rails-apps-images-and-alternative-text/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2009/07/03/accessible-rails-apps-images-and-alternative-text/</link>
	<description>professional web development and consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2009/07/03/accessible-rails-apps-images-and-alternative-text/comment-page-1/#comment-25775</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2009/07/03/accessible-rails-apps-images-and-alternative-text/#comment-25775</guid>
		<description>@Henrik N:

I assume you&#039;re referring to advice like &lt;a href=&quot;http://universalusability.com/access_by_design/images/irrelevant.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.  I think that article explains it quite well. It&#039;s important to make a distinction between &quot;valid&quot; and &quot;accessible&quot; though. 

My advice though, is to keep decorative images out of the code altogether and insert it with CSS. Decoration is the stylesheet&#039;s job. Images in the markup should be content, and should thus have ALT text that&#039;s descriptive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Henrik N:</p>
<p>I assume you&#8217;re referring to advice like <a href="http://universalusability.com/access_by_design/images/irrelevant.html" rel="nofollow">this</a>.  I think that article explains it quite well. It&#8217;s important to make a distinction between &#8220;valid&#8221; and &#8220;accessible&#8221; though. </p>
<p>My advice though, is to keep decorative images out of the code altogether and insert it with CSS. Decoration is the stylesheet&#8217;s job. Images in the markup should be content, and should thus have ALT text that&#8217;s descriptive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik N</title>
		<link>http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2009/07/03/accessible-rails-apps-images-and-alternative-text/comment-page-1/#comment-25769</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.napcsweb.com/blog/2009/07/03/accessible-rails-apps-images-and-alternative-text/#comment-25769</guid>
		<description>And worth mentioning: it&#039;s perfectly valid, and often a good idea, to set the alt text to the empty string. This is especially true for pure decorational images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And worth mentioning: it&#8217;s perfectly valid, and often a good idea, to set the alt text to the empty string. This is especially true for pure decorational images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
