Accessible Rails Apps - Rails Links, REST and JavaScript Hidden Forms

Posted by Brian in Rails, Usability, Accessibility (July 1st, 2009)

This is the first in a series of articles on developing accessible Rails applications. Accessibility is really important to me as I spend a lot of time working on web sites and applications that need to adhere to Section 508 guidelines. Making web sites accessible is also the Right Thing To Do.

JavaScript and Accessibility

When developing Rails applications, I try really hard to develop the entire application without using JavaScript, since a lot of users who rely on screen reading software can experience problems with AJAX, so these people tend to disable scripting. Using a screen reader is a lot like looking at a web page through a paper towel tube. You can’t see the whole thing at once, and it’s not likely that you are going to see something changing on the screen, and I’ve never come across screen reading software that can really let you know when a section of the page has been replaced. It might tell me that the content has changed, but I have to make it read the whole page back to me again and figure out what happened. Popup advertisements add to the problem, so people tend to just turn of the JavaScript completely.

Accessibility doesn’t just mean the users with disabilities, though. It can also mean those BlackBerry users who have horrible JavaScript support. So, what we’re really talking about is the age-old idea of “progressive enhancement.” Make a low-tech version work first, then spice it up.

Rails and REST

When you develop Rails applications and you’re working to keep your applications adhering to a RESTful design, certain URLS can only be accessed by certain methods. For example, to delete a record, you’re supposed to send a DELETE request to the destroy action of the controller.

Web browsers can only do GET and POST requests. GET requests are only supposed to read data, and POST requests are intended to change data. You POST to create something. Rails uses hidden form fields to emulate the DELETE and PUT methods.

However, Rails allows you to build links that can do other types of requests, like the DELETE request that’s planted in the default scaffolding. Honestly this is one of the single biggest mistakes the Rails core team has ever made. Here’s why:

This code:

  <%=link_to "Delete", project_path(@project), :method => :delete %>

actually produces a hidden HTML form. When you click this link, it actually submits the hidden form. This requires JavaScript to run and also mixes behavior with HTML markup. It’s a truly ugly situation that really should never be used.

A simple solution

The simple solution is to use the button_to helper instead. It generates the same form, but requires no JavaScript to activate it.

  <%=button_to "Delete", project_path(@project), :method => :delete %>

But I don’t want a button!

You don’t have to have one. As Tore Darell points out on his blog, the appropriate way to handle this is to do the opposite of what Rails was doing. You build the form yourself using button_to, but use unobtrusive JavaScript to replace the form with a link, by simply hiding the form, adding an observer to the newly created link which submits the form.

Add this to your application.js file to replace all of your button_to instances.

document.observe('dom:loaded', function(){
  $$('form.button-to').each(function(form){
      var link = new Element('a', {href:'#', 'class':'button-to'});
      link.update(form.down('input[type=submit]').value);
      link.observe('click', function(e){
        e.stop();
        form.submit();
      });
      form.insert({after:link});
      form.hide();
  });
});

Tore got it right, and the Rails team got it wrong. This solution is great because

  • It’s accessible. With JS disabled, the buttons will work and perform the appropriate actions.
  • It’s clean. The JS is unobtrusive. It’s not intermixed with your code, and it doesn’t use DOM Level 0 “onclick” which, in some instances, is considered deprecated or invalid markup.
  • It makes it look like a link without the need to resort to crazy CSS antics.
  • A single fix replaces all occurrances. You’re not generating duplicate JavaScript code all over your views like you would with link_to :method => :delete.

Replacing a single instance

You can replace button_to instances that contain a specific class if you simply wrap the JavaScript code in a simple if... block:

   <%=button_to "Dismiss", user_message_dismissals(:message_url => message.id), :class=>"dismissible" %>

    if(form.descendants().any(function(element){ return element.hasClassName("dismissible")})){
         var link = new Element('a', {href:'#', 'class':'button-to'});
         ...
    }

And I’m sure there are better ways to do that, too.

That’s it for now. I welcome your comments and suggestions on this topic and others.

lazy_developer gets some TLC

Posted by Brian in News, Rails, Projects (June 10th, 2009)

lazy_developer is a Ruby on Rails plugin I use on a lot of my projects to make my life easier as a developer. It’s a collection of Rake tasks that automate some common operations. Some of the more interesting features it provides are

  • the ability to dump a database to YAML format and then pull it back in again
  • a simple way to obliterate models, controllers, views, helpers, and related files easily (in the case of a refactor or a fat-fingered typo
  • a method to compact your migrations into a single migration file
  • and of course, automatically clone your test database whenever you migrate

Today, Kevin Gisi and I gave this plugin some much-needed love and attention after we discovered a few problems. Here’s what’s new:

Data exporting works with Rails versions prior to 2.0

Got an old database you’d like to pull in? This now works in Rails 1.2.3!

Data dumping works much better now!

We noticed some duplicate records sneaking into the output files, and it was due to a mistake I made when I implemented my own version of record pagination. It wasn’t limiting correctly, and Kevin quickly spotted the reason why. It also wasn’t storing records in the YAML file properly either, which I also resolved.

This is tested on Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, and SQLite3.

Migration compacting works now

This was patched a few days ago and merged in, but I flip-flopped a couple of lines during a merge and it made it into the master branch that way. Kevin decided he’d like support for Subversion for this, so he added it. I’ll add in Git support very soon.

Interested in using this on your projects? Go get lazy_developer right now!

Slides from “Learning To Walk In Shoes” presentation

Posted by Brian in News, Howto (May 14th, 2009)

As promised, here’s the slide deck from my talk “Learning To Walk In Shoes” from April’s Twin Cities Code Camp. After the slides, we went over some demo applications, and you can get those from Github so you can play around with them yourself.

Learning To Walk In Shoes

Rails and Legacy Databases

Posted by Brian in News, Rails (May 7th, 2009)

Here are the slides from my RailsConf 2009 talk. You can watch the slides below, download the PDF.

Rails and Legacy Databases (PDF slides)

Bob Martin - What Killed Smalltalk Can Kill Ruby Too

Posted by Brian in Rails, Projects, Testing (May 7th, 2009)

I had the extreme pleasure to watch Bob Martin talk at RailsConf. He is an amazing speaker for more than just his delivery style (which is amazing). He’s incredibly bright, and has a wealth of experience that everyone can learn from. The majority of his talk was focused on acting professionally, and his definition of professionalism means, specifically, writing tests for every line of code in your application.

I can’t agree with this more. Without a robust test suite, your application is garbage. As Bob said in his talk, without tests you will be afraid to change your coe because it will break and you’ll have to spend hours finding out why. When you have tests, making changes is much easier because you no longer have fear.

If you have applications without tests, write them. Follow Bob Martin’s rule - “Check the code back in a little cleaner than you found it.” If you don’t know how, let me know. I offer effective one-on-one or group virtual training sessions.

If you are writing applications for clients, you need to test your code. If you’re working with a development firm, you should ask them how they test the code you pay them to write. Professional developers write tests and can then respond quickly to changes. Amateurs just hack things together, and then charge you hourly to fix their mistakes.

RailsConf - Don’t Mock Yourself Out.

Posted by Brian in News, Rails (May 5th, 2009)

David Chelimsky gave a great presentation on mocking and stubbing. I liked the fact that he talked about a lot of the fears that people have when they do rely on mocks and stubs. It was also nice to see someone clearly state that one of the problems we have in the Rails community when it comes to testing frameworks (and most other libraries) is that people tend to promote their own projects while trashing other libraries. He challenged an audience member to create a site where we could write up comparisons.

Highlights of the talk:

  • Stubs vs. mocks
  • “Ravioli” code where everything is clumped up in nice separate concerns
  • “Calzone” code, like Rails, which is harder to test in isolation.
  • Stubble, a wonderful-sounding library that can completely stub out an ActiveRecord object, which will be usable in every testing framework.

RailsConfigModel updated

Posted by Brian in News, Rails, Projects (April 22nd, 2009)

The Rails Config Model gem makes it extremely easy to create a “settings” table in your application. It creates a configuration controller and model that can be used to quickly create configuration table for your system so you can store system-wide variables that you’d like the site administrator to be able to set.

You can see instructions on usage or contribute to the project.

LazyDeveloper update

Posted by Brian in News, Rails, Projects (April 22nd, 2009)

For those unfamiliar, LazyDeveloper is a Rails plugin that provides tasks to simplify some cumbersome development tasks. I find it to be an indispensable tool. The latest version (1.1.4) fixes a couple of bugs related to running tests, and introduces a couple of new features which you can read about at the project page.

This is the last release of the plugin. I’ve decided to move this to a gem instead.

If you’re interested in contributing, feel free to fork the project and send pull requests!

Twin Cities Code Camp VI: Shoes!

Posted by Brian in News, Projects (April 11th, 2009)

I had a great time talking about building applications with Shoes, which is an amazing Ruby-based GUI framework originally aimed at kids but awesome for grownups too. The source code for the examples covered in the talk is available at http://github.com/napcs/shoes_demo_apps/.

Slides coming very soon.

Subversion Repository issues

Posted by Brian in News (April 11th, 2009)

The Subversion repository is now available again so anyone who needs to grab plugins or files from there should no longer have any issues.

Next Page »